Farm activity input data analysis from suckler cow system


  • Ondrej Pastierik National Agricultural and Food Centre
  • Miroslav Záhradník National Agricultural and Food Centre, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Slovak Republic
  • Andrea Mrekajová National Agricultural and Food Centre, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Slovak Republic
  • Ján Huba National Agricultural and Food Centre, Research Institute for Animal Production Nitra, Slovak Republic


suckler cows, beef, GHG, production efficiency, sustainability indicators


This paper aims to provide an overview of the suckler beef cow production system in Slovakia and its implications for greenhouse gases (GHG) emissions and ammonia. The study collected data from 24 farms with a total of 3,745 sucker cows in 2021, representing a variety of breeding practices and breeds used for production of weaned calves. The results shown that the farms breeding Charolaise had the lowest proportion (0.61, n=8) of permanent grassland from all land managed in contrast to Pinzgau (0.73, n=2) or Limousine (0.76, n=9) in this database. Preference of winter calving season prevailed representing 38 % of all cows (12 farms, 1415 cows) which had achieved calving rate 0.82 ± 0.13 of calf per cow and calving interval 420±35 days. In the contrast, farms that were not specific about preferred calving season reached rate 0.73±0.14 of calf per cow and calving interval 407±26 days. Mean average daily gain was 0.978 ± 0.23 g day-1 and age at weaning 188±48 days. Emission factors were 15.15 ± 3.7, 109.7± 9.3 and 0.800±0.07 kg of ammonia, methane and nitrous oxide for cow per year. Present study helps to identify information gaps on various factors such as forage quality, grazing practices, feed rations, and reproductive stage. Data on these variables even from a relatively small number of farms would provide opportunities to overcome the challenges to evaluate on-farm GHG mitigations and their trade-offs.


Berton, M. et al. (2017). Environmental footprint of the integrated France–Italy beef production system assessed through a multi-indicator approach. Agricultural Systems, 155, 33-42.

Chadwick, D. et al. (2011). Manure management: Implications for greenhouse gas emissions. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 166–167, 514-531.

Coleman, S. W., et al. (2014). Beef species symposium: difficulties associated with predicting forage intake by grazing beef cows. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 2775-2784.

Darnadiová, O. and Debrecéni, O. (2009). Charolais beef breed cattle adaptation to breeding conditions in Slovakia. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, 12(3), 81–84.

D’Occhio, M. J., Baruselli, P. S., & Campanile, G. (2019). Influence of nutrition, body condition, and metabolic status on reproduction in female beef cattle: A review. Theriogenology, 125, 277–284.

EEA (2019). EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory Guidebok (2019). Available at: (30.06.2023)

Galyean, M. L., & Gunter, S. A. (2016). Predicting forage intake in extensive grazing systems 1. Journal of Animal Science, Suppl.Supplement 6, 94, 26-43.

INRA, Noziere, P., Sauvant, D., Delaby, L. (2018). INRA feeding system for ruminants. Wageningen Academic Publishers, 640.

IPCC 2019, 2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Calvo, Buendia, E., Tanabe, K., Kranjc, A., Baasansuren, J., Fukuda, M., Ngarize, S., Osako, A., Pyrozhenko, Y., Shermanau, P. and Federici, S. (eds). Published: IPCC, Switzerland.

Jančík, F., Koukolová, V., & Homolka, P. (2010). Ruminal degradability of dry matter and neutral detergent fibre of grasses. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 55(9), 359-371. doi: 10.17221/211/2009-CJAS

Kizeková, M. et al. (2020). Monitoring of organic carbon stock in temporary and permanent grasslands. In S. Marcinčák, B. Semjon, J. Golian (Eds.), Recenzovaný zborník vedeckých prác Slovenskej spoločnosti pre poľnohospodárske, lesnícke, potravinárske a veterinárske vedy pri Slovenskej akadémii vied v Bratislave, (pp. 40). Košice: GARMOND Nitra

Lalman et al. (2004). Supplementing Beef Cows. Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet ANSI – 3010. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University. Available online at: Accessed on June 7, 2023.

Lancaster, P. A., & Larson, R. L. (2022). Evaluation of Strategies to Improve the Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Cow–Calf Production Systems. Animals, 12(3), 385.

McGinn, S. M., & Sommer, S. G. (2007). Ammonia emissions from land-applied beef cattle manure. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 87(3), 345–352.

Mullins, I. L. et al. (2019). Validation of a Commercial Automated Body Condition Scoring System on a Commercial Dairy Farm. Animals, 9(6), 287.

Myhre, G., D. et al. (2013). Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. In: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, p.73-79, Available at:

NASEM. (2016). Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle: Eighth Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Ogino, A. et al. (2007), Evaluating environmental impacts of the Japanese beef cow–calf system by the life cycle assessment method. Animal Science Journal, 78: 424-432.

Ouatahar, L. et al. (2021). Modelling the effect of feeding management on greenhouse gas and nitrogen emissions in cattle farming systems. Science of the Total Environment, 776, 145932

Paulisová, M. et al. (2009). Changes in floristic composition of grassland affected by the different exploitation intensity. Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica, 22(3), 101–109.

Rotz, C. A. (2017). Modeling greenhouse gas emissions from dairy farms. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(7), 6675–6690.

Richmond, A. D., Wylie, A., Laidlaw, A. S., & Lively, F. (2015). Methane emissions from beef cattle grazing on semi-natural upland and improved lowland grasslands. Animal, 9(1), 130–137.

Rouquette, F.M. (2015). Grazing systems research and impact of stocking strategies on pasture-animal production efficiencies. Crop Science, 55(6), 2513-2530.

Sapkota, D. et al. (2020). Quantification of cow milk yield and pre-weaning calf growth response in temperate pasture-based beef suckler systems: A meta-analysis, Livestock Science, Vol 241(11),

Stolbova, M. & Molcanova, J. (2009). Evaluation of support for farms in less-favoured areas in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Rural Areas and Development, 6, pages 1-17.

Súpis hospodárskych zvierat k 31.12.2021. (2021). ŠÚ SR, 4, 46.

Smith, G. et al. (2005). Traceability from a US perspective. Meat Science, 71(1), 174–193.

Vencl, B. (1991). Nové systémy hodnocení krmiv pro skot. Praha, Sborník AZV ČSFR, č. 148, 1991, 134 p.

ZCHMD. (2023). Zväz chovateľov mäsového dobytka. Retrieved from






Animal Science