Occurrence, causes and consequences of keel bone damage of laying hens
Keywords:
laying hens, welfare, keel bone damage, fracture, productionAbstract
Keel bone damage (KBD) is a multifactorial problem. This problem applies to all types of housing systems, caged as well as cage-free systems, including free-range and organic. The common causes are in particular collisions with the elements of the environment, such as perches, as well as collisions between hens. Extremely high frequency and severity of damage adversely affects not only welfare of laying hens also their production and egg quality too. This article provides an overview of current knowledge about the occurrence of KBD, the causes of its occurrence and consequences for the quality of life of laying hens in intensive large-scale production conditions. In the introductory part, we describe what keel bone is, the high incidence and prevalence of the problem, which implies the importance of long-term dealing with this issue at the global level. In the next part, we deal with the factors that can cause the occurrence of KBD, the relationship between the occurrence of KBD and bone quality, nutrition with an emphasis on calcium, the relationship between KBD and welfare, individual housing systems, age, genotypes of hens, feathering, efficiency and quality of production of laying hens and in the final part section we present detection methods. As already mentioned, the occurrence of KBD is influenced by a number of factors, but due to the differences in the prevalence of this problem in different countries, further comprehensive research is needed. The deviations and fractures of the keel bone can have a negative impact on the welfare of laying hens, which will subsequently be reflected in the possible painfulness of feed intake, laying, product quality, which ultimately will always affect economic efficiency. The goal of long-term research should to try to reduce the incidence of these conditions, or their prevention. It is important to deal with genetic selection, nutrition, a very important area, as far as KBD is concerned, are the conditions of the breeding environment, especially the housing system and the elements that make up the equipment of the rearing and breeding area, as well as the standardization of the methods used to detect damage to the keel bone. Palpation, post-mortem palpation, multiple sensing technologies are used. Researcher training can significantly improve both the accuracy and reliability of assessment of sternal fractures and deviations. If the results of keel bone prevalence will be compared or combined between individual studies, all methods used to detect keel bone damage should be accurate, i.e. sufficient methodological details should be given for each study and the method of determining prevalence should be standardized.
References
Ali, A.B.A. et al. (2019). Nighttime roosting substrate type and height among 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system. Poultry Science, 98(5), 1935-1946. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey574
Ali, A.B.A. et al. (2020). A risk assessment of health, production, and resource occupancy for 4 laying hen strains across the lay cycle in a commercial-style aviary system. Poultry Science, 99(10), 4672-4684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.05.057
Baker, S.L. et al. (2020). Keel impacts and associated behaviors in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 222, 104886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.104886
Bilčík, B. et al. (2019). Poškodenia hrebeňa hrudnej kosti nosníc: Je to problém aj na Slovensku? In 46. konference České a Slovenské etologické společnosti. 1. vyd. ilustr., tab. ISBN 978-80-907520-0-9. Konference České a Slovenské etologické společnosti. Bratislava : Česká a slovenská etologická spoločnosť, 2019, s. 47.
Buckner, G.D. et al. (1950). The Comparative Rates of Growth and Calcification of the Femur, Tibia and Metatarsus Bones of the Male and Female New Hampshire Chicken Having Straight Keel. Poultry Science, 29(3), 332-335. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0290332
Buijs, S. (2019). Assessing keel bone damage in laying hens by palpation: effects of assessor experience on accuracy, inter-rater agreement and intra-rater consistency. Poultry Science, 98(2), 514-521. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey326
Campbell, D.L.M, et al. (2016). Failed landings after laying hen flight in a commercial aviary over two flock cycles. Poultry Science, 95(1), 188-197. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev270
Campbell, D.L.M. (2020). Skeletal health of layers across all housing systems and future research directions for Australia. Animal Production Science, 61, 883-892. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN19578
Candelotto, L. et al. (2017). ANIMAL WELL-BEING AND BEHAVIOR Susceptibility to keel bone fractures in laying hens and the role of genetic variation. Poultry Science, 96(10), 3517-3528. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex146
Casey-Trott, T. M. et al. (2015). Methods for assessment of keel bone damage in poultry. Poultry Science, 94(10), 2339-2350. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pev223
Casey-Trott,T.M, et al. (2017). Rearing system affects prevalence of keel bone damage in laying hens: a longitudinal study of four consecutive flocks. Poultry Science, 96(7):2029–2039. doi:10.3382/ps/pex026
Dedousi, A. et al. (2022). Production Performance, Egg Quality Characteristics, Fatty Acid Profile and Health Lipid Indices of Produced Eggs, Blood Biochemical Parameters and Welfare Indicators. Plos One, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063157
EFSA (2012). Statement on the use of animal-based measures to assess the welfare of animals. EFSA Journal, 10(6), 2767. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2767
Eusebio-Balcazar, P.E. et al. (2018). Limestone particle size fed to pullets influences subsequent bone integrity of hens. Poultry Science, 97(5), 1481-1483. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex412
Eusemann, B.K. et al. (2018). Radiographic examination of keel bone damage in living laying hens of different strains kept in two housing systems. Plos One, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194974
Eusemann, B.K. et al. (2020). The Role of Egg Production in the Etiology of Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens. Plos One, 7(81). https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00081
Eusemann, B.K. et al. (2022). Bone quality and composition are influenced by egg production, layer line, and oestradiol-17ss in laying hens. Avian Pathology, 51(3), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079457.2022.2050671
FAWC. (2010). Opinion on Osteoporosis and Bone Fractures in Laying Hens. London: UK, Farm Animal Welfare Council; 11 p. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/325043/FAWC_opinion_on_osteoporosis_and_bone_fractures_in_laying_hens.pdf
Fleming, R.H. et al. (2004). Incidence, pathology and prevention of keel bone deformities in the laying hen. British Poultry Science, 45(3), 320-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660410001730815
Fulton, R.M. (2019). Health of Commercial Egg Laying Chickens in Different Housing Systems. Plos One, 63(3). https://doi.org/10.1637/11942-080618-Reg.1
Gautron, J. et al. (2021). Review: What are the challenges facing the table egg industry in the next decades and what can be done to address them? Plos One, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2021.100282
Gebhardt-Henrich. S. G. et al. (2017). Limited Associations between Keel Bone Damage and Bone Properties Measured with Computer Tomography, Three-Point Bending Test, and Analysis of Minerals in Swiss Laying Hens. Frontiers an d Veterinary Sciene, 4(128). https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00128
Gebhardt-Henrich, S.G. et al. (2019). Improving intra- and inter-observer repeatability and accuracy of keel bone assessment by training with radiographs. Poultry Science, 98(11), 5234-5240. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez410
Gerpe, C. et al. (2021). Examining the catching, carrying, and crating process during depopulation of end-of-lay hens. Plos One, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2020.100115
Gregory, N. G. et al., (1990). Gregory NG, Wilkins LJ, Eleperuma SD, Ballantyne AJ and Overfield ND, 1990. Broken bones in domestic fowls:effect of husbandry system and stunning method in end-of-lay hens. British Poultry Science, 31(1), 59-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669008417231
Habig, C. et al. (2021). Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens-Its Relation to Bone Mineral Density, Body Growth Rate and Laying Performance. Plos One, 11(6), 1546. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061546
Haidong Wei et al. (2022). Keel bone damage affects behavioral and physiological responses related to stress and fear in two strains of laying hens. Animal Science, 100(4), skac076. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skac076
Halás, S., Baranová, I., Zigo, F., et al. (2023). Deviations of exterior characters from breeding standards of chicken – part I: medium-weight breeds. International Journal of Avian & Wildlife Biology, 7(1), 1-6. https://10.15406/ijawb.2023.07.00183
Harlander-Matauschek, A et al. (2015). Causes of keel bone damage and their solutions in laying hens. Worlds Poultry Science Journal, 71(3), 461-472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933915002135
Harrison, C. at al. (2023). Intraobserver repeatability for a standardized protocol to quantify keel bone damage in laying hens using discrete and continuous radiographic measures. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, 64(3), 393-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.13209
Heerkens, J.L.T. et al. (2016). Ramps and hybrid effects on keel bone and foot pad disorders in modified aviaries for laying hens. Poultry Science, 95(11), 2479-2488. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew157
Hester, P.Y. (2014). The effect of perches installed in cages on laying hens. World´s Poultry Science Journal, 70(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933914000270
Chargo, N.J. et al. (2019). Keel bone differences in laying hens housed in enriched colony cages. Poultry Science, 98(2), 1031-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey421
Chew, J. et al. (2021). The effect of light intensity on the body weight, keel bone quality, tibia bone strength, and mortality of brown and white feathered egg-strain pullets reared in perchery systems. Poultry Science, 100(11), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2021.101464
Jung, L. et al. (2019). Possible risk factors for keel bone damage in organic laying hens. Animals, 13(10), 2356-2364. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111900003X
Kajlich, A.S .et al. (2015). Incidence, Severity, and Welfare Implications of Lesions Observed Postmortem in Laying Hens from Commercial Noncage Farms in California and Iowa. Avian Diseases, 60(1), 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1637/11247-080415-Reg.1
Kittelsen, K.E. et al. (2020). A Descriptive Study of Keel Bone Fractures in Hens and Roosters from Four Non-Commercial Laying Breeds Housed in Furnished Cages. Plos One, 10(11), 2192. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112192
Korver, D.R. (2004). Assessing bone mineral density in vivo: quantitative computed tomography. Poultry Science, 83(2), 222-229. https://10.1093/ps/83.2.222
Lazarov, L. and Toscano, M (2022). Use of a calcium particulate and feeding time alone or in combination with hydroxyholecalciferol to reduce fractire susceptibility in laynig hens. AgroLife Scientific Journal, 11(1), 99-103.
Malchow, J. et al. (2022). Productive performance, perching behavior, keel bone and other health aspects in dual-purpose compared to conventional laying hens. Poultry Science, 101(11), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102095
Moinard, C., et al. (2004). Accuracy of laying hens in jumping upwards and downwards between perches in different light environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 85(1-2), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2003.08.008
Nannoni, E. et al. (2022). Influence of Increased Freedom of Movement on Welfare and Egg Laying Pattern of Hens Kept in Aviaries. Animals, 12(18), 2307. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12182307
Nasr, M.A.F, (2013). The effect of keel fractures on egg production, feed and water consumption in individual laying hens. British Poultry Science, 54(2), 165-170. https://10.1080/00071668.2013.767437
Nielsen, S.S. et al. (2023). Welfare of laying hens on farm. EFSA Journal, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7789
Norman, K.I. et al. (2018). The effect of experience of ramps at rear on the subsequent ability of layer pullets to negotiate a ramp transition. Plos One, 208, 92-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2018.08.007
Norman, K.I. et al. (2021). Rearing experience with ramps improves specific learning and behaviour and welfare on a commercial laying farm. Scientific Reports, 11, 8860. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-88347-9
Opinion on Osteoporosis and Bone Fractures in Laying Hens. London: UK, Farm Animal Welfare Council (2010). 11 p. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/325043/FAWC_opinion_on_osteoporosis_and_bone_fractures_in_laying_hens.pdf
Petrik, M.T. et al. (2015). On-farm comparison of keel fracture prevalence and other welfare indicators in conventional cage and floor-housed laying hens in Ontario, Canada. Poultry Science, 94(4), 579-585. doi:10.3382/ps/pev039
Pettersson, I.C. et al., (2017). Provision of a resource package reduces feather pecking andimproves ranging distribution on free-range layer farms. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 195, 60-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2017.06.007
Pufall, A. et al. (2021). Effects of rearing aviary style and genetic strain on the locomotion and musculoskeletal characteristics of layer pullets. Animals, 11(3), 634. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030634
Pullin, A.N. et al. (2020). Pullet Rearing Affects Collisions and Perch Use in Enriched Colony Cage Layer Housing. Plos One, 10(8), 1269. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10081269
Regmi, P. et al. (2016). Comparisons of bone properties and keel deformities between strains and housing systems in end-of-lay hens. Poultry Science, 95(10), 2225-2234. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew199
Riber, A.B. and Hinrichsen, L.K. (2016). Keel-bone damage and foot injuries in commercial laying hens in Denmark. Animal Welfer, 25(2), 179-184. https://doi.org/10.7120/09627286.25.2.179
Riber, A.B. and Hinrichsen, L.K. (2017). Welfare Consequences of Omitting Beak Trimming in Barn Layers. Front Veterinary Science, 4(222), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2017.00222
Riber, A.B. et al. (2018). The influence of Keel Bone Damage on welfare of Laying Hens. Front Veterinary Science, 5(6), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00006
Richards, G. J. M. A. et al. (2011). Use of radiography to identify keel bone fractures in laying hens and asses healing in live birds. Veterinary Record, 169(11), 279. doi: 10.1136/vr.d4404
Rodenburg, T.B, et al. (2008). Welfare assessment of laying hens in furnished cages and non-cage systems: an on-farm comparison. Animal Welfare, 17(73), 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S096272860002786X
Rojs, O.Z. et al. (2020). Welfare assessment of commercial layers in Slovenia. Slovenian Veterinary Research, 57(3), 133-143. https://doi.org/10.26873/SVR-971-2020
Rorvang, M.V. et al. (2019). Welfare of layers housed in small furnished cages on Danish commercial farms: the condition of keel bone, feet, plumage and skin. British Poultry Science, 60(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071668.2018.1533632
Rufener, C. and Makagon M.M. (2020). Keel bone fractures in laying hens: a systematic review of prevalence across age, housing systems, and strains. Journal of Animal Science, 98, Issue Supplement 1, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa145
Sandilands, V. et al. (2009). Providing laying hens with perches: fulfilling behavioural needs but causing injury? Poultry Science, 50(4), 395-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071660903110844
Saraiva, S. et al. (2020). Assessment of fear response and welfare indicators in laying hens from barn systems. Livestock Science, 240(104150). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104150
Scholz, B. et al. (2008). Keel bone condition in laying hens: a histological evaluation of macroscopically assessed keel bones. Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift, 121(3-4), 89-94. https://doi.org/10.2376/0005-9366-121-89
Scholz, B. et al. (2014). Dustbathing in food particles does not remove feather lipids. Poultry Science, 93(8), 1877-1882. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03231
Sibanda, T.Z. et al. (2020). Body weight sub-populations are associated with significant different welfare, health and egg production status in Australian commercial free-range laying hens in an aviary system. European Poultry Science, vol. 84. https://doi.org/10.1399/eps.2020.295
Soezcue, A. et al. (2022). Comparison of Behavioral Time Budget and Welfare Indicators in Two Local Laying Hen Genotypes (Atak-S and Atabey) in a Free-Range System. Animals, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010046
Stratmann, A. et al. (2015). Soft Perches in an Aviary System Reduce Incidence of Keel Bone Damage in Laying Hens. Plos one, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122568
Stratmann, A. et al. (2016). Genetic selection to increase bone strength affects prevalence of keel bone damage and egg parameters in commercially housed laying hens. Poultry Science, 95(5), 975-984. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew026
Stratmann, A. et al. (2019). Frequency of falls in commercial aviary-housed laying hen flocks and the effects of dusk phase length. Plos One, vol. 216(1), 26-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2019.04.008
Taylor, P. E. et al. (2003). The ability of domestic hens to jump between horizontal perches: effects oflight intensity and perch colour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 83
(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00127-8
Thofner, I. et al. (2020). Pathological characterization of keel bone fractures in laying hens does not support external trauma as the underlying cause. Plos One, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229735
Thofner, I.C.N. et al. (2021). Keel bone fractures in Danish laying hens: Prevalence and risk factors. Plos One, 16(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256105
Tunaydin, G. and Yilmaz Dikmen, B. (2019). Impact of light-emitting diode and compact fluorescent lighting type and cage tier on layers reared in an enriched cage system, part 2: some welfare traits. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 43(5), 627-635. https://doi.org/10.3906/vet-1903-75
Webster, A.B. (2004). Welfare implications of avian osteoporosis. Poultry Science, 83(2), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.2.184
Wei, H.D. et al. (2020). Keel fracture changed the behavior and reduced the welfare, production performance, and egg quality in laying hens housed individually in furnished cages. Poultry Science, 99(7), 3334-3342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2020.04.001
Wei, H.D. et al. (2021). Dietary Soybean Oil Supplementation Affects Keel Bone Characters and Daily Feed Intake but Not Egg Production and Quality in Laying Hens Housed in Furnished Cages. Frontiers on Veterinary Science, vol. 8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.657585
Whitehead, C.C. and Fleming, R.H. (2000). Osteoporosis in cage layers. Poultry Science, 79(7), 1033-1041. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.7.1033
Whitehead, C. C. (2004). Overview of bone bilogy in the egg-laying hen. Poultry Science, 83(2), 193-199. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/83.2.193
Wilkins, L. J. S. N. et al. (2004). Investigation ofpalpation as a method for determinig the prevalence of keel and furculum damage in laying hens. Veterinary Record, 155(18), 547-549, https://10.1136/vr.155.18.547
Wilkins, L.J. et al. (2011). Influence of housing system and design on bone strength and keel bone fractures in laying hens. Veterinary Record, 169(16), 414. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.d4831
Wurtz, K. E.at al. (2022). Commercial layer hybrids kept under organic conditions: a comparison of range use, welfare, and egg production in two layer strains. Poultry Science, 101(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.102005
Zheng, H. et al. (2019). Modification of perchery system: Preference for ramps rather thanladders during early adaptation period for cage-reared pullets. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 12(4), 34-42. https://10.25165/j.ijabe.20191204.4030
Zigo, F., Ondrašovičová, S., Veszelits Laktičová, K., Vargová, M (2020). The Influence of Housing for Laying Hens on the Economics of Egg Production. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 8(6). https://doi.org/10.24203/ajafs.v8i6.6437
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Henrieta Arpášová, Marie Hamadova, Dariusz Kokoszynski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
